Psykiske lidelser og plager ved vedvarende opioidbruk for langvarige ikke-kreftrelaterte smerter ­ en registerstudie.

Background: Knowledge of mental disorders among patients with persistent opioid use for the treatment of chronic non-cancer pain is essential, as mental disorders and symptoms can exacerbate or perpetuate pain and impact on the ability of patients to manage their illness. We have studied the prevalence of mental disorders and symptoms, including substance use disorders, in patients with persistent opioid use in 2019. Material and method: Persons ≥ 18 years with persistent opioid use and persons ≥ 18 years with at least one registered mental disorder in the specialist healthcare service in 2019 were included. Data were retrieved from national health registries in Norway. Patients who received opioids reimbursed for the treatment of chronic pain were compared with those who received opioids without reimbursement. Results: The prevalence of mental disorders and symptoms was 34 % among 14 403 persons who received reimbursed opioids, and 42 % among 38 001 persons who received opioids without reimbursement. This is equivalent to a two to threefold increase in prevalence compared to the general population. There was a particularly higher prevalence of anxiety disorders and substance use disorders. The prevalence of mental disorders and symptoms was highest in the age group 18-44 years (49-55 %). Interpretation: Among patients with persistent opioid use, a large proportion had mental disorders and symptoms, which are known risk factors for developing problematic opioid use and opioid use disorder.

Patterns of filled prescriptions and the association with risk of drug-induced death. A population-based nested case-control register study.

PURPOSE: Opioid analgesics (OA) and other pharmaceuticals have been associated with drug-induced deaths. However, there is a lack of knowledge regarding patterns of use of these pharmaceuticals in the population and regarding such associations. We identify and describe subgroups of people with different patterns of filled prescriptions of OA and other relevant pharmaceuticals and examine associations with drug-induced deaths. In addition, we estimate the proportion of drug-induced deaths with a filled OA prescription and OA as cause of death. METHODS: A Norwegian population-based nested case-control register study with cases (drug-induced deaths 2010-2018, N = 2388) and population controls matched for age, gender and year of inclusion (N = 21 465). Patterns of filled prescriptions for opioid analgesics (OA), benzodiazepines and benzodiazepine-related drugs, gabapentinoids, ADHD medication and antidepressants/antipsychotics were explored by k-means cluster analysis. Associations with drug-induced deaths were estimated by conditional logistic regression adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics. Overlap of filled OA prescriptions and OA as cause of death was estimated. RESULTS: Five clusters were identified: 'few prescriptions', 'weak OA', 'ADHD medication', 'sedative/psychiatric morbidity' and 'strong OA'. The 'strong OA' cluster had higher socioeconomic status compared to the other groupings. The risk of drug-induced death was also highest in this cluster (OR = 35.5; CI 25.6-49.3) and, for 68% (CI 64-73) of cases, filled prescriptions for OA was indicated as the underlying cause of death. CONCLUSIONS: The cluster analysis identified a subgroup with filled prescriptions of OA and other pharmaceuticals and a higher socioeconomic status than other subgroups. This subgroup had a high risk of drug-induced death that needs to be addressed.

Comparative Risk of Major Congenital Malformations With Antiseizure Medication Combinations vs Valproate Monotherapy in Pregnancy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Valproate should be avoided in pregnancy, but it is the most effective drug for generalized epilepsies. Alternative treatment may require combinations of other drugs. Our objectives were to describe first trimester use of antiseizure medication (ASM) combinations that are relevant alternatives to valproate and determine whether specific combinations were associated with a lower risk of major congenital malformations (MCM) compared with valproate monotherapy. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study using linked national registers from Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden and administrative health care data from the United States and New South Wales, Australia. We described first trimester use of ASM combinations among pregnant people with epilepsy from 2000 to 2020. We compared the risk of MCM after first trimester exposure to ASM combinations vs valproate monotherapy and low-dose valproate plus lamotrigine or levetiracetam vs high-dose valproate (≥1,000 mg/d). We used log-binomial regression with propensity score weights to calculate adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) and 95% CIs for each dataset. Results were pooled using fixed-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Among 50,905 pregnancies in people with epilepsy identified from 7.8 million total pregnancies, 788 used lamotrigine and levetiracetam, 291 used lamotrigine and topiramate, 208 used levetiracetam and topiramate, 80 used lamotrigine and zonisamide, and 91 used levetiracetam and zonisamide. After excluding pregnancies with use of other ASMs, known teratogens, or a child diagnosed with MCM of infectious or genetic cause, we compared 587 exposed to lamotrigine-levetiracetam duotherapy and 186 exposed to lamotrigine-topiramate duotherapy with 1959 exposed to valproate monotherapy. Pooled aRRs were 0.41 (95% CI 0.24-0.69) and 1.26 (0.71-2.23), respectively. Duotherapy combinations containing low-dose valproate were infrequent, and comparisons with high-dose valproate monotherapy were inconclusive but suggested a lower risk for combination therapy. Other combinations were too rare for comparative safety analyses. DISCUSSION: Lamotrigine-levetiracetam duotherapy in first trimester was associated with a 60% lower risk of MCM than valproate monotherapy, while lamotrigine-topiramate was not associated with a reduced risk. Duotherapy with lamotrigine and levetiracetam may be favored to treat epilepsy in people with childbearing potential compared with valproate regarding MCM, but whether this combination is as effective as valproate remains to be determined. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that in people with epilepsy treated in the first trimester of pregnancy, the risk of major congenital malformations is lower with lamotrigine-levetiracetam duotherapy than with valproate alone, but similar with lamotrigine-topiramate.

Recognition and management of children and adolescents with conduct disorder: a real-world data study from four western countries.

BACKGROUND: Conduct disorders (CD) are among the most frequent psychiatric disorders in children and adolescents, with an estimated worldwide prevalence in the community of 2-4%. Evidence-based psychological outpatient treatment leads to significant improvement in about two-thirds of cases. However, there seems to be considerable variation in rates of CD diagnoses and implementation of evidence-based interventions between nations. The aim of this study was to compare administrative prevalence and treatment patterns for CD in children and adolescents seen in health care systems across four Western countries (Denmark, Germany, Norway, and the USA). METHODS: Cross-sectional observational study using healthcare data to identify children and adolescents (aged 0-19 years) with an ICD-10 code for CD within the calendar year 2018. Within each country's study population, the prevalence of CD, psychiatric comorbidity, psychopharmacological treatment, and psychiatric hospitalisation was calculated. RESULTS: The prevalence of diagnosed CD differed 31-fold between countries: 0.1% (Denmark), 0.3% (Norway), 1.1% (USA) and 3.1% (Germany), with a male/female ratio of 2.0-2.5:1. The rate of psychiatric comorbidity ranged from 69.7 to 86.1%, with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder being most common. Between 4.0% (Germany) and 12.2% (USA) of youths with a CD diagnosis were prescribed antipsychotic medication, and 1.2% (Norway) to 12.5% (Germany) underwent psychiatric hospitalisation. CONCLUSION: Recognition and characteristics of youths diagnosed with CD varied greatly by country. In some countries, the administrative prevalence of diagnosed CD was markedly lower than the average estimated worldwide prevalence. This variation might reflect country-specific differences in CD prevalence, referral thresholds for mental health care, diagnostic tradition, and international variation in service organisation, CD recognition, and availability of treatment offers for youths with CD. The rather high rates of antipsychotic prescription and hospitalisation in some countries are remarkable, due to the lack of evidence for these therapeutic approaches. These findings stress the need of prioritising evidence-based treatment options in CD. Future research should focus on possible reasons for inter-country variation in recognition and management of CD, and also address possible differences in patient-level outcomes.

Fatal drug overdoses in individuals treated pharmacologically for chronic pain: a nationwide register-based study.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic pain patients may be at an increased risk for drug overdoses as a result of comorbid psychiatric disorders and treatment with risk-increasing prescription medications, such as opioids. We aimed to characterise fatal drug overdoses and investigate factors associated with the deaths among individuals who had been treated pharmacologically for chronic pain. METHODS: We included all individuals who received analgesics reimbursed for chronic pain in Norway during 2010-9 (n=569 047). Among this population, we identified all individuals with drug overdoses as cause of death (cases). Extracting data from national registries on diagnoses, filled prescriptions, and socioeconomic variables, we used a nested case-control design to compare the cases with age- and sex-matched controls from the study population. RESULTS: Overall, 623 (0.11%) individuals in the study population died of an overdose. Most, 66.8%, had overdosed accidentally, and 61.9% as a result of pharmaceutically available opioids. Compared with the controls (n=62 245), overdoses overall were associated strongly with substance use disorders (adjusted odds ratio 7.78 [95% confidence interval 6.20-9.77]), use of combinations of opioids, benzodiazepines and related drugs and gabapentinoids (4.60 [3.62-5.85]), previous poisoning with pharmaceuticals (2.78 [2.20-3.51]), and with living alone the last year of life (2.11 [1.75-2.54]). Intentional overdoses had a stronger association with previous poisonings with pharmaceuticals whereas accidental overdoses were strongly associated with substance use disorders. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the need for better identification of overdose and suicide risk in individuals treated for chronic pain. Extra caution is needed when treating complex comorbid disorders, especially with overdose risk-increasing medications.

Antibiotic use during pregnancy in Sweden: A nationwide utilization study covering 2007-2019.

INTRODUCTION: Antibiotics are often prescribed during pregnancy. Assessing the current state of prenatal antibiotic use is therefore imperative for optimizing prescribing and identifying emerging research priorities. The study aimed to describe recent trends and patterns in antibiotic use during pregnancy among women who gave birth in Sweden, including user characteristics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Population-based descriptive study using linked nationwide registers. All pregnancies delivered in Sweden from 2007 to 2019 were included. Prevalence of use was defined as the percentage of pregnancies during which at least one prescription forantibiotics was filled. Temporal trends in the prevalence of antibiotic use by calendar year, trimester and weeks of gestation were assessed from time series graphs. RESULTS: Prescriptions for systemic antibiotics were filled in 20.7% of 1 434 431 pregnancies overall, decreasing from 24.7% in 2007 to 18.0% in 2019. Phenoxymethylpenicillin (8.5%), pivmecillinam (6.5%), nitrofurantoin (4.7%), amoxicillin (1.6%) and cefadroxil (1.5%) use were the most prevalent. Their use decreased over the 13-year period, except for pivmecillinam, which increased from 4.0% to 7.4%. Prevalence of use was highest in the second trimester (9.5%), with weekly trends peaking at 13 and 34 weeks of gestation. Compared with non-users, antibiotic users more often belonged to the youngest and oldest age strata, carried multipleton pregnancies, had delivered before, had attained a lower education level and smoked in early pregnancy. A higher body mass index, asthma, chronic renal disease and diabetes mellitus were more prevalent among antibiotic users than among non-users. CONCLUSIONS: Although outpatient antibiotic use during pregnancy in Sweden has been declining, one in five pregnancies was exposed to systemic antibiotics.

Prescription high-risk polysubstance use among opioid maintenance treatment patients.

BACKGROUND: Among individuals receiving buprenorphine or methadone as opioid maintenance treatment (OMT), concomitant use of other central nervous system depressants, including prescription drugs, can increase risk of overdose. We aimed to 1) determine the prevalence of use of high-risk prescription drugs (opioid analgesics, benzodiazepines, benzodiazepine-related drugs, and gabapentinoids) among OMT patients, 2) calculate its associations with different mental health and pain-related diagnoses, and 3) compare prevalence of concomitant use with the general population. METHODS: A national sample comprising all individuals filling at least one prescription of OMT drugs in Norway in 2019 was formed. Healthcare registry data were linked to investigate high-risk prescription drug use and different diagnoses. We calculated one-year prevalence of use, amount dispensed in defined daily doses (DDDs), and the number of prescribers for the different high-risk prescription drugs. Logistic regression was used to determine associations (adjusted odds ratios; aOR, 95% confidence intervals (CIs)) between diagnoses and use. Prevalence of use was calculated both in the OMT patient sample and the general population. RESULTS: Among the OMT patient sample (n=7,299), 47.6% (n=3,476) filled prescriptions for benzodiazepines. For each high-risk prescription drug group, there was a median of 1-2 prescribers. Musculoskeletal diagnoses were the strongest factor for concomitant high-risk prescription drug use for both males (aOR 3.23, CI: 2.72-3.85) and females (aOR 3.07, CI: 2.42- 3.90). The 1-year prevalence of benzodiazepine use was 11.4 times higher for males and 7.1 times higher for females in OMT than the general population. The amount in DDDs was higher for every drug for OMT patients than the general population, particularly for benzodiazepines. CONCLUSIONS: OMT patients frequently filled prescriptions for high-risk drugs, and in higher dosages than the general population. However, we found little evidence of 'doctor shopping.' Given that these prescription drugs carry overdose risk, particularly when combined with OMT drugs, our findings emphasize the continued need for education and caution to both prescribers and patients on their concomitant use with OMT.

Gender differences in physical morbidity in opioid agonist treatment patients: population-based cohort studies from the Czech Republic and Norway.

BACKGROUND: Physical diseases represent a significant burden for opioid agonist treatment (OAT) patients. This study described physical morbidity in two national cohorts of OAT patients focusing on gender differences. METHODS: This population-based cohort study linking multiple health registers investigated physical diseases (ICD-10) in patients receiving OAT in the Czech Republic (N = 4,280) and Norway (N = 11,389) during 2010-2019. Gender-stratified analysis was performed. RESULTS: Overall, we found a large burden of physical morbidity across gender groups in OAT patients. In the Czech Republic and Norway, women in OAT had a significantly higher prevalence of physical diseases across most diagnostic chapters, notably genitourinary diseases and neoplasms. Injuries/external causes and infectious/parasitic diseases were among the most common diseases in both women and men. Viral hepatitis accounted for over half of infectious morbidity in women and men in both cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the need for early screening, detection, and treatment of diseases and conditions across organ systems and the integration of health promotion activities to reduce physical morbidity in OAT patients. The gender differences underline the need for a tailored approach to address specific medical conditions.

Epidemiological overview of major depressive disorder in Scandinavia using nationwide registers.

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common psychiatric disorder associated with a high disease burden. This study gives a comprehensive overview of the prevalence, outcomes, treatment, and genetic epidemiology of MDD within and across the Scandinavian countries. Methods: This study has aimed to assess and compare across Norway, Denmark, and Sweden 1) the prevalence and trajectories of MDD and comorbidity, 2) outcomes and treatment, and 3) heritability (Denmark and Sweden only). The analyses leveraged data on 272,944 MDD cases (and 6.2 million non-cases) from Norway, Sweden, and Denmark in specialist care in national longitudinal health registers covering 1975-2013. Relying on harmonized public data global comparisons of socioeconomic and health metrics were performed to assess to what extent findings are generalizable. Findings: MDD ranked among the most prevalent psychiatric disorders. For many cases, the disorder trajectory was severe, with varying proportions experiencing recurrence, developing comorbid disorders, requiring inpatient treatment, or dying of suicide. Important country differences in specialist care prevalence and treatment were observed. Heritability estimates were moderate (35-48%). In terms of socioeconomic and health indices, the Scandinavian nations were comparable to one another and grouped with other Western nations. Interpretation: The Scandinavian countries were similar with regards to MDD epidemiological measures, but we show that differences in health care organization need to be taken into consideration when comparing countries. This study demonstrates the utility of using comprehensive population-wide registry data, outlining possibilities for other applications. The findings will be of use to policy makers for developing better prevention and intervention strategies. Funding: Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådet, award D0886501 to PFS), US National Institutes of Mental HealthR01 MH123724 (to PFS), European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program (847776 and 964874, to OA) and European Research Council grant (grant agreement ID 101042183, to YL).

Cause-Specific Mortality among Patients in Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder in Multiple Settings: A Prospective Comparative Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Among people receiving current or previous opioid maintenance treatment (OMT), the leading cause of premature death is an opioid overdose. However, other causes of mortality remain high in this group. An understanding of causes of deaths across multiple settings can be useful in informing more comprehensive prevention responses. The aim of this study was to describe all non-overdose causes of death in three national cohorts (Czechia, Denmark, and Norway) among OMT patients and to explore associations of non-overdose mortality with age and gender. METHODS: This prospective comparative cohort study used national mortality registry databases for OMT patients from Czechia (2000-2019), Denmark (2000-2018), and Norway (2010-2019). Crude mortality rates and age-standardized mortality rates (ASMRs) were calculated as deaths per 1,000 person years for cause-specific mortality. RESULTS: In total, 29,486 patients were included, with 5,322 deaths recorded (18%). We found variations in causes of death among the cohorts and within gender and age groups. The leading non-overdose causes of death were accidents in Czechia and Denmark, and neoplasms in Norway. Cardiovascular deaths were highest in Czechia, particularly for women in OMT (ASMR 3.59 vs. 1.24 in Norway and 1.87 in Denmark). CONCLUSION: This study found high rates of preventable death among both genders and all age groups. Different demographic structures, variations in risk exposure, as well as variations in coding practices can explain the differences. The findings support increased efforts towards screening and preventative health initiatives among OMT patients specific to the demographic characteristics in different settings.

Prenatal opioid exposure and risk of asthma in childhood: a population-based study from Denmark, Norway, and Sweden.

Background: Opioids may modulate the immune function through opioid receptors on immune cells. Long-term consequences of prenatal opioid exposure on the immune system, such as childhood asthma, are unknown. Objectives: To investigate whether prenatal opioid exposure is associated with the risk of childhood asthma. Methods: Cohort study using linked nationwide registers in Denmark (1996-2015), Norway (2005-2015), and Sweden (2006-2013). Children born by mothers who were chronic opioid analgesics users before pregnancy (n = 14,764) or who were receiving opioid maintenance therapy (OMT) before or during pregnancy (n = 1,595) were identified based on information from each of the medical birth registers and prescription registers. Long-term opioid analgesics exposed children were compared to short-term exposed or unexposed, whereas OMT exposed children were compared to OMT unexposed. Asthma among children ≥1 years of age was defined as two or more filled prescriptions of antiasthmatic medication within 365 days, or a diagnosis of asthma. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression with attained age as the time scale. Inverse probability of treatment weights based on propensity scores were applied to adjust for measured confounders. Individual level data from Norway and Sweden were pooled, whereas individual level data from Denmark were analyzed separately. For the opioid analgesics comparisons, adjusted HRs (aHR) from the combined Norwegian/Swedish data and the Danish data were pooled in a fixed-effects meta-analysis. Results: For the opioid analgesics cohort, no increased risk of asthma was observed in long-term exposed children neither compared with unexposed [aHR = 0.99 (95% CI 0.87-1.12)], nor compared with short-term exposed [aHR = 0.97 (0.86-1.10)]. No increased risk of asthma was observed in OMT exposed compared with OMT unexposed children [Norway/Sweden: aHR = 1.07 (0.60-1.92), Denmark: aHR = 1.25 (0.87-1.81)]. Results from sensitivity analyses, where potential misclassification of the outcome and misclassification of OMT exposure were assessed, as well as starting follow-up at 6 years of age, showed that the estimates of association were generally robust. Conclusion: We found no association between prenatal exposure to opioids and risk of childhood asthma. Results were consistent across two different opioid exposure groups with different confounder distributions.

Prenatal exposure to pregabalin, birth outcomes and neurodevelopment - a population-based cohort study in four Nordic countries.

INTRODUCTION: Pregabalin is an antiepileptic drug frequently prescribed to pregnant women. Risks of adverse birth and postnatal neurodevelopmental outcomes following prenatal exposure to pregabalin are uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between prenatal exposure to pregabalin and the risks of adverse birth and postnatal neurodevelopmental outcomes. METHODS: This study was conducted using population-based registries in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden (2005-2016). We compared pregabalin exposure against no exposure to antiepileptics and against active comparators lamotrigine and duloxetine. We obtained pooled propensity score-adjusted estimates of association using fixed-effect and Mantel-Haenszel (MH) meta-analyses. RESULTS: The total number of pregabalin-exposed births was 325/666,139 (0.05%) in Denmark, 965/643,088 (0.15%) in Finland, 307/657,451 (0.05%) in Norway, and 1275/1,152,002 (0.11%) in Sweden. The adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) following pregabalin exposure versus no exposure were 1.14 (0.98-1.34) for major congenital malformations and 1.72 (1.02-2.91) for stillbirth, which attenuated to 1.25 (0.74-2.11) in MH meta-analysis. For the remaining birth outcomes, the aPRs were close to or attenuated toward unity in analyses using active comparators. Adjusted hazard ratios (95% CI) contrasting prenatal pregabalin exposure versus no exposure were 1.29 (1.03-1.63) for ADHD and attenuated when using active comparators, 0.98 (0.67-1.42) for autism spectrum disorders, and 1.00 (0.78-1.29) for intellectual disability. CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal exposure to pregabalin was not associated with low birth weight, preterm birth, small for gestational age, low Apgar score, microcephaly, autism spectrum disorders, or intellectual disability. On the basis of the upper value of the 95% confidence interval, increased risks greater than 1.8 were unlikely for any major congenital malformation and ADHD. For stillbirth and most groups of specific major congenital malformations, the estimates attenuated in MH meta-analysis.

Maternal and Early-Life Exposure to Antibiotics and the Risk of Autism and Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Childhood: a Swedish Population-Based Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Antibiotics represent the most common type of medication used during pregnancy and infancy. Antibiotics have been proposed as a possible factor in changes in microbiota composition, which may play a role in the aetiology of autism and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Our aim was to investigate the association between maternal and early-life antibiotic use and autism and ADHD in childhood. METHODS: This Swedish nation-wide population-based cohort study included all first live singleton births (N = 483,459) between January 2006 and December 2016. The association of dispensed antibiotics with autism and ADHD in children aged ≤ 11 years was estimated by applying multivariable logistic regression and generalised estimating equations models. RESULTS: Of the mothers, 25.9% (n = 125,106) were dispensed ≥1 antibiotic during the exposure period (from 3 months pre-conception to delivery), and 41.6% (n = 201,040) of the children received ≥ 1 antibiotic in early life (aged ≤ 2 years). Penicillin was the most prescribed antibiotic class (17.9% of mothers, 38.2% of children). Maternal antibiotic use was associated with an increased risk of autism [odds ratio (OR) = 1.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09-1.23] and ADHD (OR = 1.29, 95% CI 1.21-1.36) in childhood. Early-life exposure to antibiotics showed an even stronger association [autism (OR = 1.46, 95% CI 1.38-1.55); ADHD (OR = 1.90, 95% CI 1.80-2.00)]. Both maternal and childhood-exposure sub-analyses suggested a dose-response relationship. CONCLUSION: Maternal and early-life antibiotic use was associated with an increased risk of autism and ADHD in childhood. However, differences were noted by exposure period and antibiotic classes.

Antibiotics are commonly prescribed to pregnant women, infants, and toddlers. Antibiotic use during pregnancy may alter the maternal microbiota, which can influence the microbial colonisation of the gastrointestinal system of the foetus. It has been claimed that antibiotic use during pregnancy may have an effect on the gut-brain axis and, as a result, neurodevelopment. Neurodevelopmental disorder (NDD) is a category of illnesses characterised by functional impairments that manifest early in development. The most frequent NDDs are autism and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). In this large Swedish nation-wide study, we assessed whether antibiotic use during pregnancy and/or early in life affects the risk of developing autism and ADHD. The study found that both maternal antibiotic usage, as well as early childhood antibiotic use, were associated with an increased risk of autism and ADHD in children. These associations were altered by the quantity, type, and timing of antibiotic exposure.

In-utero antibiotic exposure and subsequent infections in infancy: a register-based cohort study with sibling analysis.

BACKGROUND: Prenatal antibiotic use, the ensuing maternal dysbiosis, and subsequent acquisition of altered microbiota in early life have been linked to the offspring's increased susceptibility to childhood infections. However, infection risks during the first year of life associated with in-utero antibiotic exposure have not been comprehensively explored. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the associations between exposure to antibiotics in utero and subsequent infections during infancy and whether such associations differ by antibiotic class. STUDY DESIGN: All data were retrieved from Swedish population-based registers. Singletons live-born between 2006 and 2018 were followed up from birth to their first birthday. Exposure was maternal filling of at least 1 antibiotic prescription between the last menstrual period and delivery. Outcomes were the infants' antimicrobial prescription fills, incident infections diagnosed in specialist care, and deaths with infections indicated as underlying or contributing causes ("infection-related deaths"). Birth year, birth season, maternal age, place of residence, parity, comorbidity indicator, body mass index, proxies for general health status, education level, and smoking status were considered covariates. Poisson regression was used to estimate crude and adjusted incidence rate ratios with 95% confidence intervals for the number of antimicrobial prescriptions filled to the infant. Cox regression was used to estimate crude and adjusted hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals for incident infections diagnosed in specialist care and at death. Sibling analyses were used to account for shared familial factors. Sensitivity of the results to exposure definition and perinatal factors prognostic for the outcomes were assessed in supplementary analyses. RESULTS: Of 1,347,018 infants in the full cohort, 294,657 (21.9%) were exposed to antibiotics in utero. There were 677,430 antimicrobial prescriptions filled (1.380 per 1000 person-days), 423,705 incident infections diagnosed in specialist care (0.870 per 1000 person-days), and 2800 infection-related deaths (0.006 deaths per 1000 person-days) during follow-up. Compared to unexposed, infants exposed to antibiotics in utero had higher rates of antimicrobial prescription fills (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-1.34), incident infections diagnosed in specialist care (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-1.29), and infection-related mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.25). For antimicrobial prescriptions and infections diagnosed in specialist care, associations were consistent across most antibiotic classes but were attenuated in the sibling analyses: adjusted incidence rate ratio of 1.05 (95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.06) and adjusted hazard ratio of 1.05 (95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.07), respectively. No association with infant mortality was found in the sibling cohort (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-1.08). CONCLUSION: The minor associations between exposure to antibiotics in utero and infections during infancy were partly explained by shared familial factors and did not differ across frequently used antibiotic classes.

Comparative Safety of Antiseizure Medication Monotherapy for Major Malformations.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to examine the comparative safety of antiseizure medication (ASM) monotherapy in pregnancy with respect to risk of major congenital malformations (MCMs), overall and by MCM subtype. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study using national health register data from Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden (1996-2020). We compared pregnancies with first trimester exposure to lamotrigine monotherapy to ASM-unexposed, carbamazepine, valproate, oxcarbazepine, levetiracetam, and topiramate to lamotrigine monotherapy, and stratified monotherapy groups by dose. The outcome was nongenetic MCM and specific subtypes. We estimated adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with log-binomial regression and propensity score weights. RESULTS: There was a higher crude risk of any MCM in pregnancies exposed to lamotrigine monotherapy (n = 8,339) compared to ASM-unexposed pregnancies (n = 4,866,362), but not after confounder adjustment (aRR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.87-1.08). Compared to lamotrigine, there was an increased risk of malformations associated with valproate (n = 2,031, aRR = 2.05, 95% CI = 1.70-2.46) and topiramate (n = 509, aRR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.26-2.60), which increased in a dose-dependent manner. We found no differences in malformation risk for carbamazepine (n = 2,674, aRR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.72-1.15), oxcarbazepine (n = 1,313, aRR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.83-1.44), or levetiracetam (n = 1,040, aRR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.53-1.13). Valproate was associated with several malformation subtypes, including nervous system, cardiac, oral clefts, clubfoot, and hypospadias, whereas lamotrigine and carbamazepine were not. INTERPRETATION: Topiramate is associated with an increased risk of MCM similar to that associated with valproate, but lower doses may mitigate the risks for both drugs. Conversely, we found no increased risks for lamotrigine, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, or levetiracetam, which is reassuring. ANN NEUROL 2023;93:551-562.

Cohort Description: Preventing an Opioid Epidemic in Norway - Focusing on Treatment of Chronic Pain (POINT) - A National Registry-Based Study.

Aim: The POINT project aims to provide evidence to optimise chronic pain management, prevent adverse consequences of opioids, and improve chronic pain patients' pain relief, functional capacity, and quality of life. We describe the outline of the project and its work packages. More specifically, we describe a cohort of persons with chronic pain and a cohort of long-term opioid users identified from a national registry linkage. Data Sources: The project utilises data from nationwide healthcare and population registers in Norway. Using the Norwegian Prescription Database, we identified a cohort of persons who have been dispensed drugs reimbursed for chronic pain and a cohort of persons who used opioids long term from 2010 to 2019. Data from the Norwegian Registry for Primary Health Care and the Norwegian Patient Registry (2008-2019), Cancer Registry (1990-2018) Cause of Death Registry (2010-2019) and demographic and socioeconomic registers from Statistics Norway (2010-2019) were linked to the cohorts. Study Population: There were 568,869 participants with chronic pain. Sixty-three percent of the cohort was women, and the mean age was 57.1 years. There were 336,712 long-term opioid users (58.6% women; 60.9 years). In chronic pain and long-term opioid user cohorts, the most frequent musculoskeletal diagnosis was back pain diagnosed in primary care (27.6% and 30.7%). Psychiatric diagnoses were also common. Main Variables: Upcoming studies will utilise psychiatric and somatic diagnoses from the patient registers, drug use from the prescription register, causes of death, demographics, and socioeconomic status (eg, education, income, workability, immigrant status) as exposures or outcomes. Conclusion and Future Plans: The two cohorts have numerous pain-related diagnoses, especially in the musculoskeletal system, and noticeably frequent somatic and psychiatric morbidity. The POINT project also includes later work packages that explore prescriber and patient perspectives around safe and effective treatment of chronic pain.

Individuals Dying of Overdoses Related to Pharmaceutical Opioids Differ from Individuals Dying of Overdoses Related to Other Substances: A Population-Based Register Study.

BACKGROUND: Pharmaceutical opioid (PO) overdose deaths have increased in many Western countries. There are indications that those dying from a PO overdose differ from those dying from other types of overdoses. These differences might pose a challenge as the majority of current preventive measures are tailored toward those with the characteristics of "conventional" overdose deaths. OBJECTIVE: We investigated differences in the characteristics of persons who died from PO overdoses compared to all other overdoses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry, we retrieved information on overdoses classified according to ICD-10 and identified PO overdoses (T40.2; T40.4) and all other overdoses (T40.X; T43.6) in 2010-2019. By linking data from nationwide registers, we analyzed data on opioid dispensations and the history of mental and behavioral disorders. 1,224 persons were registered with PO overdoses and 1,432 persons with other overdoses. RESULTS: Persons in the PO overdose group were older and were more frequently women (35.0% vs. 20.5%) than persons with other overdoses. They had a higher prevalence of chronic pain (35.8% vs. 13.2%), history of cancer (8.1% vs. 1.8%), filled prescriptions of analgetic opioids more frequently the month before death (38.8% vs. 12.0%), and used threefold higher doses of prescribed opioids compared to individuals in all other overdose group (66 vs. 26 oral morphine equivalents/day). In the PO overdose group, oxycodone and fentanyl were more frequently dispensed, while codeine was more frequently dispensed in the other overdose groups. A lower proportion of those in the PO overdose group had recorded diagnoses of substance use disorders, schizophrenia, and hyperkinetic disorder compared to the other overdose groups. CONCLUSION: Persons dying from overdoses on POs often differ from the population targeted by existing prevention strategies, as they are more frequently older women with chronic pain and using high doses of prescription opioids.

Association between folic acid use during pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus: Two population-based Nordic cohort studies.

INTRODUCTION: Inconsistent results have been reported on the association between folic acid use in pregnancy and risk of GDM. The aim of this study was to estimate the association between folic acid use and GDM in two population-based Nordic cohorts. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two cohort studies were conducted using data from the national population registers in Norway (2005-2018, n = 791,709) and Sweden (2006-2016, n = 1,112,817). Logistic regression was used to estimate the associations between GDM and self-reported folic acid use and prescribed folic acid use, compared to non-users, adjusting for covariates. To quantify how potential unmeasured confounders may affect the estimates, E-values were reported. An exposure misclassification bias analysis was also performed. RESULTS: In Norwegian and Swedish cohorts, adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for maternal self-reported folic acid use were 1.10 (1.06-1.14) and 0.89 (0.85-0.93), with E-values of 1.43 (1.31) and 1.50 (1.36), respectively. For prescribed folic acid use, ORs were 1.33 (1.15-1.53) and 1.56 (1.41-1.74), with E-values of 1.99 (1.57) and 2.49 (2.17), in Norway and Sweden respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The slightly higher or lower odds for GDM in self-reported users of folic acid in Norway and Sweden respectively, are likely not of clinical relevance and recommendations for folic acid use in pregnancy should remain unchanged. The two Nordic cohorts showed different directions of the association between self-reported folic acid use and GDM, but based on bias analysis, exposure misclassification is an unlikely explanation since there may still be differences in prevalence of use and residual confounding. Prescribed folic acid is used by women with specific comorbidities and co-medications, which likely underlies the higher odds for GDM.

Antimicrobial use in Sweden during the COVID-19 pandemic: prescription fill and inpatient care requisition patterns.

BACKGROUND: Increased and inappropriate antimicrobial use are the key drivers of the emergence of antimicrobial resistance, and there have been widespread concerns around potential antimicrobial misuse, overuse and their consequences during the COVID-19 pandemic. To better understand the impact of the pandemic on antimicrobial use, particularly in light of the resurgence of COVID-19 cases since the summer of 2020, we assessed trends in antimicrobial prescription fills and hospital requisitions in Sweden during 2020 against those of preceding years. METHODS: We performed a descriptive study using population-based data from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register and the Swedish e-Health Agency. The weekly number of prescriptions filled and the total volume sold to inpatient care institutions in defined daily doses (DDDs) per 1000 inhabitants for systemic antibacterials (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical therapeutic subgroup J01 excluding J01XX), antimycotics (J02), antivirals (J05) and antiprotozoals (P01) were computed and evaluated from time series graphs. A time series linear regression with ordinary least squares (OLS) estimation was used to model 2015-2019 data and predict the expected number of prescriptions filled and volumes sold in DDDs per 1000 inhabitants during 2020 with 95% confidence limits. RESULTS: From mid-March 2020, the weekly rate of antibiotic and antiprotozoal prescriptions filled plummeted to unprecedentedly low levels for the rest of the year; while unprecedentedly high numbers of antiviral prescriptions were filled weekly between mid-February and mid-March 2020. There was a net reduction in annual dispensing of antibiotics by 17%; of antiprotozoals by 21%; and of antivirals by 0.3% during 2020 compared to 2019. Inpatient care requisitions of antiprotozoals and antibiotics surged to 6-year highs during March 2020, resulting in a 127% increase in DDDs of antiprotozoals sold from 2019. The volume of antibiotics and antivirals sold to inpatient care institutions in 2020 decreased by 3% and 13% compared to 2019, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The overall decline in antimicrobial prescriptions filled in Sweden during 2020 were in part, collateral dividends of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Long-term use of opioids and concomitant use of other habit-forming drugs. / Vedvarende bruk av opioider og samtidig bruk av andre vanedannende legemidler.

BACKGROUND: Long-term use of opioids may have undesirable consequences. We have investigated long-term opioid use in patient groups that were prescribed opioids for various indications (chronic pain, palliative care, other (white prescriptions, not generally covered by the Norwegian National Insurance Scheme)) as well as the groups' concomitant use of some other addictive medications. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Persons registered in the Norwegian Prescription Database with at least one filled prescription of an opioid in the period 2011-19 were included. Long-term use in a calendar year was defined as the dispensing of > 180 defined daily doses or > 4 500 mg oral morphine equivalents distributed over at least 3 periods of 3 months. RESULTS: The number of long-term opioid users was 50 422 in 2011 and 59 996 in 2019 (10.1 and 10.7 % of all opioid users). The number who received opioids on blue prescription (partly covered by the Norwegian National Insurance Scheme) for chronic pain increased in the period by 9 952 persons, but the majority (n=38 006, 63.3 %) continued to receive opioids exclusively on white prescription in 2019. A total of 15 623 (41.1 %) and 14 881 (39.2 %), respectively, of the long-term opioid users who received opioids solely on white prescription in 2019 also received benzodiazepines and Z-hypnotics in the same year. Of the 23 967 long-term users who also received benzodiazepines, 88 % were dispensed opioids and benzodiazepines on the same day at least once in 2019. INTERPRETATION: Prolonged prescribing of opioids on white prescription and concurrent prescribing of other addictive drugs may indicate undesirable use with no clear indication.